
I Want My DVD
by Roger Nichols
Actually, I also want my CD-R, CD-RW, CD-ROM, DVD+RW, DVD-R, DVD-RAM, CD-RW,
DVD-ROM, DVD-A, DSSD and FEM. Wasnt it much easier when there was just
33 1/3-rpm, 45-rpm discs and cassettes? I even had a turntable that mounted
under the dash so you could play records in your car. I used to make compilations
of my favorite songs by copying them to my Rek-O-Kut portable disc cutter,
in 1960! But I digress.
DVD+RW.
The DVD+RW Alliance consists of Dell, HP, Mitsubishi Chemical/Verbatim, Philips,
Ricoh, Sony, Thomson and Yamaha. Some of these companies have started shipping
re-recordable DVD+RW drives. The first version of the drives does not record
DVD-R, but only DVD+RW. The next generation of drives will support DVD-R although
current drives will not be upgradeable. A DVD+RW disc is compatible with DVD-ROM
drives and standard DVD players.
What makes DVD+RW different is that you can record video directly to the drive
without authoring first, just like your trusty VHS machine recorded whatever
you shoved into it. You can also punch into previously recorded video. This
is made possible by the zero gap recording process used in DVD+RW. After you
have re-recorded one minute in the middle of a two-hour disc, it will play
back without a glitch on your video DVD player. As for current DVD-R/RW discs,
the DVD player will not play past the first insert. As far as the player is
concerned, the disc is corrupt and nothing can be accessed past the edit.
The drives will record on CD-R and CD-RW, which means you only need one drive
for all of your burning desires. Oh, by the way. HP has announced that it
will discontinue the manufacture of CD-R/RW drives. With prices down to $79
for some CD-R/RW drives it is time to move on to the next level. Backwards
compatibility with CD-R/RW makes the transition easier, but $500 for a drive
is a big jump for some. Just remember that one year ago DVD-R drives were
$2,000 to $5,000. Maybe I will wait until they come down to $79.
CD-R/RW Leftovers
Well, I still went out and bought a couple of CD-R/RW drives. Plextor is shipping
their new 40x write machine. I tried it out, and a full 80minute CD-R burned
in 1:52. Yup, that is less than two minutes to burn 80 minutes of music.
The new 40x drive uses what is known as Z-CLV, or Zone-Constant Linear Velocity.
Constant Linear Velocity means that the same length of groove goes by the
laser whether you are reading the inner part of the CD or the outer part.
That is why you see the CD slow down as the music plays. The speed changes
from 500rpm to 200rpm, but the groove passes under the laser at a constant
1.2 meters/second. If you recorded the entire disc at 40x the disc would be
turning 20,000rpm at the inner diameter, slowing to 8,000rpm at the outer
edge. At 20,000rpm someone could get hurt!
Now, if we spin the disc at 8,000rpm, the write speed at the center would
be 16x normal. As we get a little farther along, the groove is going past
at 24x, and then 32x, and finally at 40x. These are the Zones in the Z-CLV
system.
Remember that most CDs burned only contain 350 Megabytes, so you will never
get into the 32x or 40x Zone. But if you are like me, you have to have one
anyway.
Yamaha has another card up their sleeve with their Lightspeed 3, 24x drives.
They have a new slant on CD burning called Audio Master. Actually
write the disc at 1.4 meters/second instead of 1.2 meters/second. This means
that you can only get 63 minutes of audio on a 74-minute disc, but the pits
and lands that make up the data are slightly longer. This is still within
the Red Book specification of plus/minus 10%.
Yamaha says that this system reduces jitter and produces better sounding CD-Rs.
I burned one today and listened back, but it sounded the same as the normal
speed disc. I will have to do more checking on this one. Oh, the disc plays
back at the same speed as it was recorded. The pits whiz by at the same number
of pits per second, the pits are just longer so the disc spins faster. It
all works out.
High Speed Burn Errors
Since we are talking about fast CD burners, what about the error rate at higher
speeds? Well, it used to be that 2x was the best speed to burn at for low
error rates. If you went any higher, you were producing an inferior product.
As the disc turned faster the LASER was on for a shorter time to burn the
pit because the pit went by faster. The pit geometry suffered and the error
rate went up. This is no longer true.
The latest generation of CD-R recorders contain variable power LASERs and
therefore pump the same quanta of energy into the pit at all speeds. If the
LASER is on for a shorter period of time, then the power is boosted to make
sure that the correct amount of energy was used to insure the proper formation
of the pit.
After error checking 17 different brands of media on 7 different drives at
all speeds from 1x to 40x, none of the drives produced more errors at higher
speeds, and most of them produced lower error rates at the higher speeds.
Mitsui silver discs showed the lowest overall error rate at all speeds. So,
as long as you use media labeled for use at the proper speed, go for it. Charge
the client for an hour per disc and burn them in less than three minutes each.
That is what I call profit!
Copy Protection Again.
Some labels are using a new copy protection scheme on CDs. It turns out that
the copy protected CDs wont play back on all CD players. They wont
play at all on a Mac, DVD player, or game console. The audio cannot be ripped
by a CD-ROM drive, but it also might not play in your car. The record company
has agreed to accept returns from irate customers, but most retail CD stores
wont let you return a CD once it has been opened.
I think the way they do it is by pressing the CD with errors imbedded in the
audio data. The player will mask the data by substituting the previous good
sample. This means that the actual audio will not be exactly the same as what
was mixed in the studio, but no one will notice except the artist, so who
cares. These errors will be copied when the disk is ripped, and saved on the
copy as valid data, but it wont be valid audio. These errors will play
back as distortion, frying, hissing and clicking on the copy.
What these record companies dont get is that if you can hear it play
back on any player, you can copy it. Even if you copy from the analog outputs
of your CD player it will still sound ten times better than the MP3 it will
be turned into before it hits the web. All they have succeeded in doing is
preventing lots of people from buying the CD because they cant play
it back on their CD players. So they will buy the bootleg version that will
play back on anything.
Keep in mind that the Red Book standard has no provisions for copy protection,
and therefore any copy protection method makes the disc non Red Book compliant.
Sony/Philips could actually pull the license of the plant pressing these copy
protected CDs. I guess that would be the ultimate copy protection. Dont
press any CDs and they cant be copied!
Hang on; let me call my patent attorney, I think I could be on to something.
Ill get to the DVD-A, DSSD, and FEM next month.
Return to EQ index